Hypothetical Life Inane Blabbering    
September 08, 2010, 09:21:26 PM *

Hello, Guest. Welcome to the Hypothetical Life forum.

This is a place where people can discuss all aspects of alien life.
If you are looking for Klingons, Giger's Aliens or skinny, bug-eyed Greys, then this is probably not the place for you.
Here we are interested in plausible alien ideas. Taking inspiration from what we know of life on earth and applying it to theoretical discussions of what might really be out there.
Evolution, biology, chemistry, culture, technology, etc.

Come inside and have a look at our forum. You can also chat with other members and make new friends.

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Added gallery
Home Help Search Chat Store Invite Login Register
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: A Thought Experiment - I  (Read 758 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
D17
Newbie
*

Popularity: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14



View Profile Awards
« on: July 22, 2008, 01:49:07 AM »

Let's have a little experiment and consider what'd be nescessary on an alien planet for life to exist and thrive. Post what conditions you think would be nescessary on the planet.

I'll start by saying the most obvious: Liquid Water.
Logged

Nursed by warm sunbeams in primeval caves,
Organic live began beneath the waves.
Hence without parent by spontaneous birth,
Rise the first specks of animated earth.
- Erasmus Darwin
DaleyPaley
Administrator
Jr. Member
*****

Popularity: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 56



View Profile WWW Email Awards
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 03:31:24 AM »

Perhaps a moon to stabilise the orbit and a big gas giant neighbour to soak up stray comets and meteors. That's what the rare earth hypothesis says anyway.
Personally, I think it might be a little too limited; assuming conditions for earth life to be conditions for all life.
However, those things do indeed work well for us.  Cheesy
Logged
D.SCoub
Newbie
*

Popularity: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2

255878435
View Profile Awards
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2009, 09:16:17 AM »

Ive never understood the significance of questions like this.  The answer is so obvious that Im not sure what lesson or insight were supposed to gleam from this. 

Its the same with the oft-repeated moral question about the train track and the five people tied up.  It essentially asks if you would be willing to push another man in front of a train to stop it from hitting the five people tied up.  Apparently people say they wouldnt do it because they have to actively push the person, rather than just flipping a switch and letting him die, which is the second scenario that people are in fact willing to do.  This moral "dilemma" has never made sense to me.  I see both actions as actively killing the person, because unless you hit that switch, the man gets to live.  But apparently other people dont see it that way.

This particular question seems very straight forward to me.  If its not H20, then its not the same as what we call water.  However, that doesnt mean that the twin Ai is not allowed to call his XYZ liquid "water" if he wants to.  The term "water" is meaningful only to people who live on Earth and speak English.  But again, apparently thats not the same conclusion other people come to?  Also, whats the point of this thought experiment?  What is it supposed to tell us?
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Designed by Baran
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!